Category: Health & Beauty

I am a passionate health, beauty, and lifestyle writer based in the south of the UK. Balancing my love for writing with raising my two children, I hopefully bring a relatable, insightful perspective to my articles.
  • The Collapse of NHS Dentistry: What Britain’s Dental Crisis Actually Looks Like on the Ground

    The Collapse of NHS Dentistry: What Britain’s Dental Crisis Actually Looks Like on the Ground

    There is a particular kind of indignity in pulling out a tooth that could have been saved. It is not dramatic. There are no cameras. Just a person in a dental chair, often in considerable pain, being told that because they could not find an NHS dentist willing to take them on, a filling that might have cost £65 under the NHS has become an extraction that costs nothing but the tooth itself. This is the NHS dentistry crisis, and it is not some abstract policy failure. It is happening daily, in every corner of Britain.

    The scale of the breakdown is staggering. According to NHS England’s own data, roughly 12 million people in England have been unable to access NHS dental care in the past two years. The British Dental Association has described the situation as a “humanitarian crisis”. These are not exaggerations borrowed from campaigners. They are the clinical consequences of a contract model that has been haemorrhaging dentists since it was introduced in 2006, accelerated by a pandemic that shuttered practices for months, and left behind a system that now struggles to fulfil even emergency obligations.

    Empty NHS dental waiting room illustrating the scale of the NHS dentistry crisis in Britain
    Empty NHS dental waiting room illustrating the scale of the NHS dentistry crisis in Britain

    Why the NHS Contract Model Is at the Heart of This

    Understanding the NHS dentistry crisis means understanding the Unit of Dental Activity, or UDA. When the 2006 contract replaced fee-per-item payments, it grouped procedures into three bands and paid dentists a fixed number of UDAs for completing each. Band 1 covers a check-up and scale and polish; Band 3 covers complex work including crowns and dentures. The problem is that a dentist earns the same UDAs whether they do one filling or five in a single appointment. Do complicated, time-consuming work and the UDA value drops per hour. Do quick, straightforward work and it rises. The perverse incentive was baked in from the start.

    Dentists who flag underperformance against their UDA targets face clawback, meaning NHS England can reclaim payments for targets not hit. Those who consistently hit targets find the work financially unsustainable compared with private practice. It is a system that manages to punish failure and success with equal generosity. Over the past decade, thousands of dentists have walked away from NHS contracts entirely. In 2023 alone, more than 1,000 NHS dental practices in England handed back their contracts. Many simply converted to private-only or mixed practices.

    What Patients Are Actually Experiencing

    The waiting lists and the geography of pain tell their own story. In rural areas of Cornwall, Lincolnshire, and large parts of Wales, patients routinely report driving upwards of two hours each way for an emergency dental appointment. Some have resorted to travelling to other countries for treatment. Others have extracted their own teeth with household tools, which is not hyperbole but documented fact, cited by the House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee in its 2023 inquiry into dentistry.

    The shift from preventive care to emergency-only intervention is perhaps the most medically alarming trend. Tooth extractions in children aged six to ten remain one of the most common reasons for hospital admission in England, despite the condition being almost entirely preventable with fluoride treatments, regular check-ups and fillings. The NHS dentistry crisis is, at its sharpest point, a children’s health crisis.

    Dental instruments on a tray representing the NHS dentistry crisis and barriers to treatment
    Dental instruments on a tray representing the NHS dentistry crisis and barriers to treatment

    Private-Pay Creep and Who Gets Left Behind

    For those with money, the system has not really collapsed. Private dentistry is thriving. The number of private dental practices has increased considerably since 2020, and corporate dental chains such as Bupa Dental Care and Dentex have expanded aggressively. NHS waiting lists have, in effect, become a business development tool for private providers, and many patients who once relied on NHS treatment have been quietly absorbed into private billing. A standard check-up privately now costs between £60 and £100. A crown can exceed £1,000.

    What this creates is a two-tier system that maps almost perfectly onto existing socioeconomic fault lines. Middle-class patients with disposable income migrate to private dentistry, resentful but managing. Those on lower incomes, those in deprived coastal and rural areas, those with complex needs, they remain in the NHS queue that is, in many places, effectively closed. The same dynamics playing out in other public health debates, from waiting times for elective surgery to mental health referrals, are replicated here with the added dimension that dental disease left untreated becomes cardiac risk, diabetic complication, and sepsis. Teeth are not optional.

    These systemic failures in public health infrastructure carry echoes of other long-neglected building safety issues affecting the same communities. Campaigners working on asbestos in schools have drawn similar parallels: slow-burning crises, underfunded bureaucracies, and communities that lack the political capital to force immediate action.

    What the Government’s Workforce Plan Actually Proposes

    In 2023, NHS England published its Long Term Workforce Plan, and in 2025 the government announced what it described as a “rescue package” for NHS dentistry. The proposals include reforming the UDA system to better reward complex care, expanding dental training places at universities, allowing dental therapists and hygienists to undertake a wider range of NHS treatments without direct dentist supervision, and creating new “golden hello” payments to incentivise newly qualified dentists into underserved areas.

    The ambition is reasonable. The scepticism from the profession is considerable. The British Dental Association has welcomed certain reforms whilst pointing out that training more dentists takes at minimum five years, that the UDA reform proposals remain insufficiently bold, and that without substantially increasing NHS contract values to make NHS work financially competitive with private practice, the outflow of dentists will continue regardless of training numbers. There is also the question of dental nurses and support staff, whose pay has lagged so badly that practices cannot fill those roles either.

    Is There a Realistic Path Back?

    Several models offer genuine hope if adopted with proper funding. Scotland’s NHS dental system, whilst facing its own pressures, has maintained higher rates of NHS access partly through different contractual structures. Community dental services in some English regions have pioneered outreach models, taking mobile dental units into schools and care homes, which has proved cost-effective precisely because it prioritises prevention. The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan gestures at these approaches but implementation remains patchy.

    The political will is uncertain. NHS dentistry sits in a peculiar position: too important to ignore, too expensive and structurally complex to fix quickly, and not quite visible enough to generate the kind of public fury that drives rapid reform. The photographs are not dramatic. Nobody is on a trolley in a corridor. The pain is dispersed, individual, and often borne in silence.

    What is not uncertain is that the current trajectory leads further toward a system where good dental health is simply something you purchase, and where preventable disease accumulates quietly in the communities least able to absorb it. For a healthcare system built on the principle that access should not depend on wealth, that is an uncomfortable place to find oneself. It is also, right now, precisely where we are.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Why can't I find an NHS dentist taking new patients?

    Thousands of dentists have left NHS dentistry since 2006 because the contract model makes NHS work financially unviable compared with private practice. NHS England estimates around 12 million people in England cannot access NHS dental care. Many practices have converted to private-only or mixed NHS/private models, leaving significant gaps particularly in rural and coastal areas.

    How much does NHS dental treatment cost in 2026?

    NHS treatment in England is organised into three charge bands. Band 1, covering a check-up and scale and polish, costs £26.80. Band 2, covering fillings and extractions, costs £73.50. Band 3, covering crowns, dentures and bridges, costs £319.10. Some patients, including those on Universal Credit, NHS Low Income Scheme recipients, and children, receive free treatment.

    What should I do if I have a dental emergency and cannot find an NHS dentist?

    Call NHS 111, which can direct you to an urgent dental care service in your area. Most regions maintain an urgent dental care network for genuine emergencies such as severe pain, swelling, or trauma. Be aware that these services address immediate problems only; they do not provide ongoing dental care or take you on as a regular NHS patient.

    Is private dentistry worth it if NHS treatment is unavailable?

    Private dental care offers faster access and often a wider range of treatments, but costs are substantially higher. A private check-up typically costs between £60 and £100, with complex work such as crowns exceeding £1,000. Dental insurance schemes and capitation plans (monthly payment plans offered by private practices) can reduce the financial impact for those who use dentistry regularly.

    What is the government doing to fix the NHS dentistry crisis?

    The government has announced reforms including changes to the UDA contract system, expanding dental training places, and introducing financial incentives to attract newly qualified dentists to underserved areas. The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan also proposes expanding the roles of dental therapists and hygienists. Critics from the British Dental Association argue these measures do not go far enough to make NHS dentistry financially sustainable for practitioners.

  • Mental Health at the Top: Why Burnout Among CEOs and Business Leaders Has Reached a Tipping Point

    Mental Health at the Top: Why Burnout Among CEOs and Business Leaders Has Reached a Tipping Point

    There is a peculiar silence around power and suffering. We have, as a society, become reasonably fluent in discussing mental health at most levels of working life. But when the conversation turns to the boardroom, something shifts. Vulnerability, it seems, remains professionally inconvenient at the very top. The result is a quiet, accelerating crisis: CEO burnout mental health has become one of the most pressing yet least publicly acknowledged challenges facing British business in 2026.

    The data, when you look at it directly, is striking. A 2025 report by the Institute of Leadership found that more than two-thirds of senior executives in the UK reported experiencing symptoms consistent with burnout in the previous twelve months. Chronic exhaustion, emotional detachment, a creeping sense of ineffectiveness, these are not abstract concepts. They are describing the lived experience of the people responsible for some of the country’s largest employers, most consequential decisions, and most complex stakeholder relationships.

    Senior executive at office window reflecting the growing issue of CEO burnout mental health
    Senior executive at office window reflecting the growing issue of CEO burnout mental health

    Why Executive Burnout Is Different, and More Dangerous

    Burnout at any level carries a real human cost. At the executive level, the consequences extend outward with particular force. A depleted chief executive does not simply underperform privately; their cognitive state shapes strategy, culture, and the working lives of thousands. Research published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology has consistently linked leader wellbeing to broader organisational health outcomes, from staff retention to risk appetite to the quality of strategic decision-making.

    What makes the experience of a CEO or senior leader distinctly difficult is the structural isolation built into the role. There is no line manager to notice the signs. Peers are often competitors. Boards expect composure. Admitting to mental strain can feel professionally fatal in environments that still, despite years of progress, conflate emotional resilience with emotional suppression. One former FTSE 100 chief executive, speaking anonymously to the BBC’s business desk last year, described feeling unable to tell anyone, not his board, not his spouse, not his executive coach, that he had not slept properly in four months.

    The pressures driving this are not mysterious. Post-pandemic economic turbulence, the accelerating pace of technological disruption, the expansion of stakeholder expectations to encompass environmental, social and governance commitments, geopolitical instability, and the persistent demands of a 24-hour news and communications cycle. Senior leaders are, in effect, being asked to hold more complexity with less margin for error than any previous generation in comparable roles.

    The Stigma That Still Quietly Governs the Boardroom

    Britain has made genuine strides on workplace mental health in the past decade. Initiatives like the Every Mind Matters campaign via the NHS, the widespread adoption of mental health first aiders, and the gradual mainstreaming of employee assistance programmes have shifted the culture meaningfully. Yet much of this progress has filtered through organisations from the middle outward. The C-suite has been slower to absorb it.

    There are structural reasons for this. Executive contracts frequently include performance clauses that create legal and financial risk around disclosures of incapacity. Boards have a fiduciary duty that can, in practice, incentivise concealment over candour. Institutional investors still scrutinise leadership stability in ways that make any suggestion of fragility feel like a market event. The stigma is not imagined; it is built into the architecture of how British corporate governance operates.

    Detail shot capturing the quiet strain associated with CEO burnout mental health in a boardroom setting
    Detail shot capturing the quiet strain associated with CEO burnout mental health in a boardroom setting

    What progressive organisations are beginning to recognise, however, is that the cost of this concealment is itself enormous. Executive turnover is extraordinarily expensive. The average cost of replacing a chief executive in a mid-to-large British company, factoring in recruitment, transition disruption, and strategic drift, runs well into seven figures. Proactive support is not a welfare gesture; it is a commercial calculation.

    What Forward-Thinking Organisations Are Actually Doing

    A small but growing cohort of British companies are treating CEO burnout mental health not as a fringe concern but as a governance priority. The approaches vary in sophistication, but several themes emerge consistently from organisations that are getting this right.

    Structured peer networks, kept strictly confidential, are proving particularly valuable. Organisations like Business in the Community and the Institute of Directors have begun facilitating small, closed groups of senior leaders who meet regularly, not to network in the transactional sense, but to speak honestly about the pressures of leadership. The value is not therapy; it is the simple, powerful relief of being understood by someone who genuinely shares your context.

    Executive health contracts, comprehensive physical and psychological screening arrangements offered as part of the benefits package for senior leaders, are also gaining traction. A number of larger UK employers now retain specialist occupational psychiatrists on a retained basis, available to senior leaders in the same way a general counsel is available for legal concerns: discreetly, without stigma, as part of the infrastructure of the role.

    Board-level accountability is perhaps the most structural shift. Some progressive organisations have introduced wellbeing as a standing item on compensation committee agendas, with the non-executive chair taking explicit responsibility for the chief executive’s health alongside their performance. This reframes the conversation entirely: it signals that sustainable performance is valued over heroic short-termism.

    The Personal Toll, and Why More Leaders Are Now Speaking Out

    Something has shifted in the willingness of senior figures to discuss their own experience. Antonio Horta-Osório’s very public departure from Credit Suisse, and his frank discussion of the mental health crisis that preceded it, opened a conversation that would have been unthinkable a decade ago. In the UK, a number of prominent business leaders have begun, carefully and selectively, to describe the personal cost of sustained high-level leadership.

    This matters because culture at the top is contagious in both directions. Organisations whose leaders model the suppression of vulnerability tend to produce cultures of suppression throughout. Conversely, a chief executive who speaks with measured honesty about the difficulty of the role, and the importance of genuine recovery, gives permission to every layer of management beneath them to do the same.

    The research increasingly supports what common sense has always suggested: psychological safety is not incompatible with high performance. It is a precondition of it. The executives who sustain exceptional performance over long periods are not those who never struggle; they are those with the self-awareness to recognise struggle early and the resources to address it before it compounds.

    What Needs to Change, and Why It Cannot Wait

    CEO burnout mental health will not resolve itself through awareness campaigns. The structural changes required are specific and, in some cases, uncomfortable for institutions invested in the mythology of the invincible leader. Corporate governance frameworks need to make space for human limitation without penalising disclosure. Boards need to be trained, not merely informed, in recognising the early signs of executive distress. The stigma will not dissolve through aspiration alone; it will dissolve through policy, practice, and sustained leadership from the very people most affected.

    Britain’s corporate culture is, on balance, moving in the right direction. The question is whether it will move quickly enough to prevent a generation of talented, experienced leaders from quietly burning through themselves before anyone in a position to help thinks to ask how they are actually doing.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What are the main signs of CEO burnout mental health issues?

    Common indicators include chronic fatigue that sleep does not resolve, emotional detachment from work and colleagues, difficulty making decisions, irritability, and a persistent sense of ineffectiveness despite outward success. Physical symptoms such as disrupted sleep, frequent illness, and tension headaches are also strongly associated with executive burnout.

    Is CEO burnout more common than burnout in other roles?

    Research suggests senior executives experience burnout at rates comparable to or exceeding those in other high-demand roles, but are significantly less likely to seek support or disclose difficulties. The structural isolation of the chief executive role, combined with governance pressures against admitting vulnerability, creates conditions where burnout is both more likely to go unaddressed and more consequential when it does.

    What should a board do if they suspect a CEO is struggling with mental health?

    The non-executive chair is typically best placed to open a private, non-judgemental conversation early. Boards should ensure access to independent occupational health support is part of the executive benefits package before a crisis occurs, rather than responding reactively. Treating the conversation as a governance matter rather than a personal one tends to reduce stigma and improve outcomes.

    Can a CEO take time off for mental health without it affecting investor confidence?

    This depends heavily on how the situation is communicated and managed. Increasingly, transparent, well-managed disclosures of planned health-related absences are received better by institutional investors than unexpected departures or erratic performance. The precedent set by figures like Antonio Horta-Osório has shifted the landscape, though significant stigma remains in certain sectors.

    What UK organisations offer support specifically for senior leader mental health?

    Business in the Community runs programmes specifically targeting executive wellbeing, and the Institute of Directors provides peer support networks for senior leaders. The charity Mental Health UK also offers resources relevant to workplace leadership. Many larger UK employers additionally retain occupational psychiatrists or executive coaching professionals with clinical training as part of their senior leadership support infrastructure.

  • Climate Anxiety Is Now a Public Health Crisis, Here’s What Governments Are Finally Doing About It

    Climate Anxiety Is Now a Public Health Crisis, Here’s What Governments Are Finally Doing About It

    For years, ecologists and psychologists occupied separate disciplines, rarely speaking the same language. That division is dissolving fast. A mounting body of peer-reviewed research now places climate anxiety squarely within the public health canon, no longer a fringe concern for coastal ecologists or catastrophising teenagers, but a measurable, diagnosable pressure affecting populations across every continent. Governments are beginning to take it seriously. Some are even legislating around it.

    What has changed is the quality of the evidence. The Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change, which publishes annually and carries considerable weight with policymakers, documented in its most recent report that extreme heat events, flooding, and prolonged wildfire seasons are generating cascading psychological consequences: elevated rates of depression, post-traumatic stress, grief, and what researchers term “solastalgia”, the distress caused by environmental change in one’s own home environment. These are not metaphors. They are clinical presentations arriving in GP surgeries and mental health clinics with increasing frequency.

    Young woman on a rain-soaked park bench reflecting on climate anxiety public health concerns in a British urban setting
    Young woman on a rain-soaked park bench reflecting on climate anxiety public health concerns in a British urban setting

    What Does Climate Anxiety Actually Look Like in Practice?

    The term “climate anxiety” risks sounding vague, even self-indulgent, to those unfamiliar with the clinical literature. It is neither. The American Psychological Association first formalised the concept in 2017, but UK researchers have since developed their own frameworks. A 2021 study by the University of Bath surveyed 10,000 young people across ten countries and found that 59 per cent felt very or extremely worried about climate change. Among UK respondents, 40 per cent said climate feelings affected their daily functioning. That is not background noise. That is a public health signal.

    Clinicians distinguish between adaptive anxiety, which motivates action, and maladaptive anxiety, which paralyses. The latter manifests as sleep disturbance, intrusive thoughts, avoidance of news, strained relationships, and in more acute cases, a reluctance to have children. Younger cohorts are disproportionately affected, but the NHS is also seeing older patients presenting with grief responses following flooding events, particularly in communities such as those in the Somerset Levels and parts of Yorkshire that have experienced repeated inundation.

    The UK’s Policy Response: Cautious Progress

    Britain’s approach to climate anxiety as a public health matter remains, to be charitable, in its early stages. The NHS Long Term Plan acknowledged environmental determinants of health in broad terms, but specific commissioning around climate-related psychological distress has been patchy at best. What has emerged instead are localised initiatives and pilot programmes, several of them genuinely thoughtful.

    NHS England has begun integrating climate health literacy into social prescribing frameworks, meaning GPs can now refer patients to “green social prescribing” projects. These schemes, trialled across seven sites including South Yorkshire and Humberside, connect patients with outdoor activities, conservation volunteering, and community gardening. Early results, published by NHS England in 2025, showed statistically significant improvements in wellbeing scores among participants. The logic is elegant: reconnecting people to the natural world addresses both the disconnection that fuels ecological grief and the sedentary isolation that worsens generalised anxiety.

    The UK Health Security Agency has also published guidance acknowledging that extreme weather events carry mental health consequences that must be planned for alongside physical ones. Flood recovery packages in several local authority areas now include mandatory mental health signposting, something that would have been considered an afterthought five years ago.

    NHS GP consultation desk with mental health leaflet related to climate anxiety public health resources
    NHS GP consultation desk with mental health leaflet related to climate anxiety public health resources

    How the EU Is Moving Further and Faster

    Where the UK has moved cautiously, the European Union has shown considerably greater structural ambition. The EU Mission on Cancer has been complemented by growing political interest in what some Brussels officials are calling a “climate health mission”, a cross-portfolio initiative linking environmental policy directly to mental health outcomes.

    Finland, consistently ranked among the world’s happiest countries, has integrated climate mental health education into its national school curriculum. Pupils are taught not only about ecological systems but about processing difficult emotions related to environmental change, a form of climate psychology that Finnish researchers argue reduces maladaptive anxiety whilst building civic resilience. Germany has established dedicated climate psychology clinics within several university hospital networks, and early demand has significantly exceeded initial projections.

    The World Health Organisation designated climate change as the defining public health threat of the 21st century, and its regional office for Europe has since published a technical guidance document on mental health and climate change, urging member states to embed psychological support within their national adaptation plans. For those interested in the full scope of WHO’s position, their European climate and health framework is worth examining.

    The Generational Fault Line

    No serious discussion of climate anxiety as a public health challenge can sidestep the generational dimension. Young people in the UK, broadly those born after 1997, have grown up with climate change as a fixed feature of their consciousness rather than a distant scientific abstraction. The psychological literature is beginning to reflect what youth mental health workers have known anecdotally for years: that this cohort experiences a particular form of anticipatory grief, mourning a future they feel has already been foreclosed.

    Organisations such as Young Minds and the Climate Psychology Alliance in the UK are lobbying for climate-aware therapy training as a standard component of counsellor and psychotherapist accreditation. At present, most practising therapists receive no formal education on how to work with climate-related distress, which means patients raising these concerns frequently encounter well-meaning but underprepared clinicians who attempt to reframe ecological anxiety as a cognitive distortion to be corrected. The Climate Psychology Alliance argues, persuasively, that this fundamentally misunderstands the problem: the anxiety is, in large part, a rational response to a real threat.

    From Awareness to Infrastructure: What Good Policy Looks Like

    The emerging consensus among researchers and policymakers who take climate anxiety public health seriously points toward a three-tier response. First, population-level awareness and destigmatisation: naming climate grief as a legitimate psychological experience removes the shame that prevents people from seeking support. Second, clinical capacity: training mental health professionals in climate-aware therapeutic approaches, funding specialised services, and ensuring that GP practices in high-risk areas have clear referral pathways. Third, structural intervention: because the most effective treatment for climate anxiety is ultimately reducing climate change itself, mental health and environmental policy cannot remain siloed.

    Scotland’s approach, under its National Performance Framework, is perhaps the most integrated in the UK, explicitly linking wellbeing outcomes to environmental sustainability indicators. It is imperfect, and implementation varies considerably by health board, but the framework at least acknowledges what the evidence demands: that a healthy population and a healthy planet are not separate policy objectives.

    The Road Ahead

    Climate anxiety is not going away. The physical realities driving it are accelerating, and the psychological literature tracking its effects is growing sharper and more alarming with each successive report. The question governments face is not whether this constitutes a public health issue; that case has been made and largely accepted. The question is whether the institutional response will match the scale of the problem before the window for genuinely preventive action closes.

    There is, paradoxically, something mildly reassuring in the fact that policymakers are finally asking the question. The NHS green social prescribing pilots, the EU’s cross-portfolio health missions, Finland’s classroom curricula, and the WHO’s regional guidance all represent serious institutional acknowledgement that the psychological cost of environmental breakdown is real, measurable, and deserving of a proper response. That is not enough. But it is, at least, a beginning.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is climate anxiety and is it a recognised mental health condition?

    Climate anxiety refers to persistent worry, distress, or fear related to climate change and its consequences. Whilst not a standalone diagnostic category in the ICD-11, it is increasingly recognised by clinical bodies including the NHS and the Climate Psychology Alliance as a significant psychological experience that can impair daily functioning and require professional support.

    How widespread is climate anxiety in the UK?

    Research from the University of Bath found that a significant proportion of UK young people report climate concerns affecting their daily lives. NHS mental health services have noted rising presentations linked to flooding events and broader ecological distress, particularly among under-35s and communities in flood-prone regions such as Yorkshire and the Somerset Levels.

    What is the NHS doing about climate-related mental health issues?

    The NHS has integrated climate health considerations into its green social prescribing framework, connecting patients experiencing anxiety or low mood with outdoor and conservation-based activities. Early pilot data from seven NHS sites, published in 2025, showed measurable improvements in participant wellbeing scores. Dedicated clinical pathways for climate-related distress remain limited but are under development.

    How are other countries tackling climate anxiety as a public health problem?

    Finland has embedded climate psychology into its national school curriculum, helping young people process ecological emotions as part of standard education. Germany has opened dedicated climate psychology clinics within university hospitals, whilst the EU is developing cross-portfolio health missions linking environmental and mental health policy. The WHO’s European regional office has also published technical guidance urging member states to include psychological support in national adaptation plans.

    Is climate anxiety the same as eco-grief or solastalgia?

    These terms are related but distinct. Eco-grief refers specifically to mourning environmental losses, such as species extinction or landscape destruction. Solastalgia describes distress caused by changes to one’s immediate home environment, often following flooding or habitat destruction. Climate anxiety is broader, encompassing anticipatory fear about future environmental deterioration. All three can co-exist and may benefit from climate-aware therapeutic approaches.

The Latest