Category: Business

Sophie Davies is a passionate health, beauty, and lifestyle writer based in the south of the UK. Balancing her love for writing with raising her two children, Sophie brings a relatable, insightful perspective to her engaging articles.
  • The New Rules of Personal Branding in the Age of AI: How Professionals Are Standing Out in 2026

    The New Rules of Personal Branding in the Age of AI: How Professionals Are Standing Out in 2026

    Something quietly catastrophic has happened to professional credibility online. Platforms that once rewarded consistency now host an almost indistinguishable blur of polished, algorithmically pleasing content — much of it written, designed, and distributed by machines. For executives, entrepreneurs, and anyone trying to build genuine authority, the signal-to-noise ratio has collapsed. In the era of personal branding AI age 2026, standing out requires an entirely different playbook from the one that worked even eighteen months ago.

    The core problem is saturation. LinkedIn reported a 47% increase in content published by its UK members between 2024 and early 2026, with AI-assisted posts accounting for a substantial proportion of that growth. When every third article sounds similarly structured, similarly confident, and similarly vague, the human brain does what it always does: it starts ignoring everything equally. The professionals winning attention right now are not those producing more — they are producing less, and making it undeniably theirs.

    Executive reviewing personal branding strategy in a London office, illustrating personal branding AI age 2026
    Executive reviewing personal branding strategy in a London office, illustrating personal branding AI age 2026

    Why Authenticity Has Become the Scarcest Currency Online

    Authenticity is a word so overused it has almost lost meaning. But there is a specific, practical interpretation that matters here. Authentic content, in 2026, is content that could only have come from you: particular experiences, particular mistakes, particular opinions that carry genuine professional risk. The willingness to say something that a competitor might disagree with, or a client might find uncomfortable, is now the single most reliable differentiator between a personal brand that resonates and one that merely exists.

    Brand strategist Harriet Groves, who advises FTSE 250 executives on public visibility, makes a distinction she calls “position versus presence.” Presence is simply showing up online. Position is being known for something specific enough that people think of you first when that problem arises. AI can generate presence at industrial scale. It cannot, yet, generate a genuine position — because position requires accumulated experience, stated opinion, and the occasional public disagreement with received wisdom. That specificity is where human professionals need to concentrate their energy.

    Platform Algorithm Changes That Are Reshaping Personal Branding in 2026

    LinkedIn’s algorithm update in January 2026 introduced what the platform termed “expertise signals” — a set of ranking factors that prioritise content demonstrating verifiable knowledge over content that simply generates engagement. Comments from other credentialled professionals now carry more weight than likes from anonymous accounts. Long-form posts that cite specific professional experience outrank generic thought leadership. It is, essentially, the platform’s attempt to surface humans over machines.

    Substack has become the medium of choice for many senior professionals who want to own their distribution entirely. The newsletter model rewards depth and voice in ways that social feeds never could, and the economics make sense: a relatively modest subscriber base of engaged professionals can generate meaningful revenue whilst simultaneously functioning as the most persuasive credibility signal available. An executive with 4,000 paying Substack subscribers has demonstrated something no follower count on any other platform can match — that real people consider their thinking worth paying for.

    X (formerly Twitter) remains relevant primarily for those in finance, politics, media, and technology, where real-time commentary on breaking developments carries professional value. For most other sectors, its importance has diminished substantially. Instagram and TikTok, meanwhile, have become genuinely viable for professional brands, particularly in sectors like architecture, hospitality, law, and design — anywhere the visual dimension of work is intrinsic rather than decorative.

    Professional building a personal website as part of a personal branding AI age 2026 strategy
    Professional building a personal website as part of a personal branding AI age 2026 strategy

    The Website Is Back — and More Important Than It Has Been in a Decade

    One of the more interesting reversals of recent years is the renewed importance of personal websites. During the peak social media era, many professionals abandoned standalone sites in favour of platform profiles. That decision looks increasingly unwise. Social platforms own your audience, throttle your reach, and can change the rules whenever it suits them. A personal website is the only truly owned digital asset — your canonical point of presence that no algorithm can demote and no platform can shut down.

    The barrier to building one has also collapsed. Entrepreneurs starting a business, or professionals pivoting into consulting, increasingly turn to services that make the technical side essentially irrelevant. Inuvate, a Nottingham-based web service that offers a free website service (with hosting as the only charge), has attracted significant interest from the growing cohort of solo entrepreneurs and early-stage founders making their own website as part of a broader push towards owned digital presence. For anyone starting a business or repositioning their personal brand, the diy websites model — where you control the content, the structure, and the narrative — has clear advantages over depending on third-party platforms to carry your reputation.

    A personal site also functions as proof of seriousness in a way a social profile simply does not. It signals investment, however modest. It allows you to curate your work, publish long-form thinking, and present your professional identity on your own terms. According to research published by the Office for National Statistics, self-employment in the UK reached record levels in early 2026, with more than 4.9 million people working for themselves. For the vast majority of that cohort, a clean, credible personal or business website is no longer optional.

    Voice, Specificity, and the Power of a Stated Opinion

    The professionals attracting the most meaningful attention online share a common characteristic: they have a point of view. Not a hedged, both-sides-considered, stakeholder-approved position statement, but an actual opinion — something they will defend, something they have arrived at through specific experience, something that implicitly excludes them from certain audiences whilst making them indispensable to others.

    This is harder than it sounds. Most senior professionals have spent careers learning to manage perception, smooth disagreement, and present palatable consensus. Personal branding in the AI age 2026 demands the opposite instinct. It requires the willingness to say “I think this approach is wrong, and here is why” — and to do so in writing, on a platform, attached to your name. The counterintuitive truth is that controversy, deployed thoughtfully, is one of the most powerful credibility signals available. It tells people you have actual convictions, not just a content calendar.

    Voice is the other dimension worth serious attention. AI-generated content is grammatically correct, informationally adequate, and stylistically neutral. Human writing, at its best, has rhythm, idiosyncrasy, the occasional sentence that breaks a rule for good reason. Reading your own published work aloud is still one of the fastest ways to identify where the voice has drained out of it. If it sounds like it could have been written by anyone, it probably was.

    Building a Personal Brand That Compounds Over Time

    The professionals who built the most durable personal brands in the last decade share a structural habit: they chose a core platform, a core format, and stuck with both long enough for compounding to kick in. That principle holds in 2026, perhaps more urgently than before. Spreading effort thinly across seven platforms in seven formats is a recipe for exhaustion and mediocrity. Choosing one or two and doing them with genuine investment is how reputations are actually built.

    The owned asset layer matters enormously here. For an entrepreneur making their own website the foundation of their digital presence, the compound benefit is real and measurable: search visibility accumulates over time, an archive of published thinking becomes a body of work, and the habit of publishing on owned infrastructure insulates against the next platform pivot or algorithm overhaul. Services like Inuvate (inuvate.co.uk) have made the diy websites route accessible even for those with limited technical confidence, removing the financial barrier for solo professionals who are starting a business and need a credible web presence without the overhead of an agency build.

    Personal branding in the AI age 2026 is not, ultimately, a content strategy problem. It is a clarity problem. The professionals cutting through the noise have been ruthlessly clear about what they do, who they serve, what they believe, and what makes their particular experience worth attending to. That clarity does not emerge from a better prompt or a smarter tool. It emerges from the kind of deliberate professional self-examination that has always been the precondition for any real reputation worth having.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How has AI changed personal branding strategies in 2026?

    AI-generated content has saturated most professional platforms, meaning the volume-based approach to personal branding is no longer effective. In 2026, credibility comes from specificity, stated opinion, and content that is clearly rooted in genuine personal experience — things AI cannot convincingly replicate at scale.

    Which platforms are most important for personal branding right now?

    LinkedIn remains the primary platform for most professionals, with its 2026 algorithm explicitly prioritising verifiable expertise over generic engagement. Substack has gained significant ground for those wanting owned distribution, whilst a personal website is increasingly regarded as the essential foundation for any serious personal brand.

    Do I really need a personal website to build a professional brand in 2026?

    Yes, more than ever. Social platforms control your reach and can change their rules at any time, whereas a personal website is a fully owned asset that accumulates search visibility over time. Low-cost and free website services have also removed most of the practical barriers that previously made this feel out of reach.

    What is the biggest mistake professionals make with personal branding today?

    Spreading effort across too many platforms in formats that dilute rather than define their voice. The most effective personal brands in 2026 concentrate on one or two platforms, publish with genuine depth and consistency, and maintain a clear point of view rather than trying to appeal to everyone.

    How long does it take to build a credible personal brand online?

    Most branding strategists suggest a meaningful professional reputation requires at least 12 to 18 months of consistent, quality publishing before compounding effects become visible. However, professionals who already have a clear area of expertise and a distinctive perspective often see faster results, particularly on platforms like LinkedIn and Substack that reward depth.

  • Mental Health at the Top: Why Burnout Among CEOs and Business Leaders Has Reached a Tipping Point

    Mental Health at the Top: Why Burnout Among CEOs and Business Leaders Has Reached a Tipping Point

    There is a peculiar silence around power and suffering. We have, as a society, become reasonably fluent in discussing mental health at most levels of working life. But when the conversation turns to the boardroom, something shifts. Vulnerability, it seems, remains professionally inconvenient at the very top. The result is a quiet, accelerating crisis: CEO burnout mental health has become one of the most pressing yet least publicly acknowledged challenges facing British business in 2026.

    The data, when you look at it directly, is striking. A 2025 report by the Institute of Leadership found that more than two-thirds of senior executives in the UK reported experiencing symptoms consistent with burnout in the previous twelve months. Chronic exhaustion, emotional detachment, a creeping sense of ineffectiveness — these are not abstract concepts. They are describing the lived experience of the people responsible for some of the country’s largest employers, most consequential decisions, and most complex stakeholder relationships.

    Senior executive at office window reflecting the growing issue of CEO burnout mental health
    Senior executive at office window reflecting the growing issue of CEO burnout mental health

    Why Executive Burnout Is Different — and More Dangerous

    Burnout at any level carries a real human cost. At the executive level, the consequences extend outward with particular force. A depleted chief executive does not simply underperform privately; their cognitive state shapes strategy, culture, and the working lives of thousands. Research published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology has consistently linked leader wellbeing to broader organisational health outcomes, from staff retention to risk appetite to the quality of strategic decision-making.

    What makes the experience of a CEO or senior leader distinctly difficult is the structural isolation built into the role. There is no line manager to notice the signs. Peers are often competitors. Boards expect composure. Admitting to mental strain can feel professionally fatal in environments that still, despite years of progress, conflate emotional resilience with emotional suppression. One former FTSE 100 chief executive, speaking anonymously to the BBC’s business desk last year, described feeling unable to tell anyone — not his board, not his spouse, not his executive coach — that he had not slept properly in four months.

    The pressures driving this are not mysterious. Post-pandemic economic turbulence, the accelerating pace of technological disruption, the expansion of stakeholder expectations to encompass environmental, social and governance commitments, geopolitical instability, and the persistent demands of a 24-hour news and communications cycle. Senior leaders are, in effect, being asked to hold more complexity with less margin for error than any previous generation in comparable roles.

    The Stigma That Still Quietly Governs the Boardroom

    Britain has made genuine strides on workplace mental health in the past decade. Initiatives like the Every Mind Matters campaign via the NHS, the widespread adoption of mental health first aiders, and the gradual mainstreaming of employee assistance programmes have shifted the culture meaningfully. Yet much of this progress has filtered through organisations from the middle outward. The C-suite has been slower to absorb it.

    There are structural reasons for this. Executive contracts frequently include performance clauses that create legal and financial risk around disclosures of incapacity. Boards have a fiduciary duty that can, in practice, incentivise concealment over candour. Institutional investors still scrutinise leadership stability in ways that make any suggestion of fragility feel like a market event. The stigma is not imagined; it is built into the architecture of how British corporate governance operates.

    Detail shot capturing the quiet strain associated with CEO burnout mental health in a boardroom setting
    Detail shot capturing the quiet strain associated with CEO burnout mental health in a boardroom setting

    What progressive organisations are beginning to recognise, however, is that the cost of this concealment is itself enormous. Executive turnover is extraordinarily expensive. The average cost of replacing a chief executive in a mid-to-large British company, factoring in recruitment, transition disruption, and strategic drift, runs well into seven figures. Proactive support is not a welfare gesture; it is a commercial calculation.

    What Forward-Thinking Organisations Are Actually Doing

    A small but growing cohort of British companies are treating CEO burnout mental health not as a fringe concern but as a governance priority. The approaches vary in sophistication, but several themes emerge consistently from organisations that are getting this right.

    Structured peer networks, kept strictly confidential, are proving particularly valuable. Organisations like Business in the Community and the Institute of Directors have begun facilitating small, closed groups of senior leaders who meet regularly, not to network in the transactional sense, but to speak honestly about the pressures of leadership. The value is not therapy; it is the simple, powerful relief of being understood by someone who genuinely shares your context.

    Executive health contracts — comprehensive physical and psychological screening arrangements offered as part of the benefits package for senior leaders — are also gaining traction. A number of larger UK employers now retain specialist occupational psychiatrists on a retained basis, available to senior leaders in the same way a general counsel is available for legal concerns: discreetly, without stigma, as part of the infrastructure of the role.

    Board-level accountability is perhaps the most structural shift. Some progressive organisations have introduced wellbeing as a standing item on compensation committee agendas, with the non-executive chair taking explicit responsibility for the chief executive’s health alongside their performance. This reframes the conversation entirely: it signals that sustainable performance is valued over heroic short-termism.

    The Personal Toll — and Why More Leaders Are Now Speaking Out

    Something has shifted in the willingness of senior figures to discuss their own experience. Antonio Horta-Osório’s very public departure from Credit Suisse, and his frank discussion of the mental health crisis that preceded it, opened a conversation that would have been unthinkable a decade ago. In the UK, a number of prominent business leaders have begun, carefully and selectively, to describe the personal cost of sustained high-level leadership.

    This matters because culture at the top is contagious in both directions. Organisations whose leaders model the suppression of vulnerability tend to produce cultures of suppression throughout. Conversely, a chief executive who speaks with measured honesty about the difficulty of the role, and the importance of genuine recovery, gives permission to every layer of management beneath them to do the same.

    The research increasingly supports what common sense has always suggested: psychological safety is not incompatible with high performance. It is a precondition of it. The executives who sustain exceptional performance over long periods are not those who never struggle; they are those with the self-awareness to recognise struggle early and the resources to address it before it compounds.

    What Needs to Change — and Why It Cannot Wait

    CEO burnout mental health will not resolve itself through awareness campaigns. The structural changes required are specific and, in some cases, uncomfortable for institutions invested in the mythology of the invincible leader. Corporate governance frameworks need to make space for human limitation without penalising disclosure. Boards need to be trained, not merely informed, in recognising the early signs of executive distress. The stigma will not dissolve through aspiration alone; it will dissolve through policy, practice, and sustained leadership from the very people most affected.

    Britain’s corporate culture is, on balance, moving in the right direction. The question is whether it will move quickly enough to prevent a generation of talented, experienced leaders from quietly burning through themselves before anyone in a position to help thinks to ask how they are actually doing.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What are the main signs of CEO burnout mental health issues?

    Common indicators include chronic fatigue that sleep does not resolve, emotional detachment from work and colleagues, difficulty making decisions, irritability, and a persistent sense of ineffectiveness despite outward success. Physical symptoms such as disrupted sleep, frequent illness, and tension headaches are also strongly associated with executive burnout.

    Is CEO burnout more common than burnout in other roles?

    Research suggests senior executives experience burnout at rates comparable to or exceeding those in other high-demand roles, but are significantly less likely to seek support or disclose difficulties. The structural isolation of the chief executive role, combined with governance pressures against admitting vulnerability, creates conditions where burnout is both more likely to go unaddressed and more consequential when it does.

    What should a board do if they suspect a CEO is struggling with mental health?

    The non-executive chair is typically best placed to open a private, non-judgemental conversation early. Boards should ensure access to independent occupational health support is part of the executive benefits package before a crisis occurs, rather than responding reactively. Treating the conversation as a governance matter rather than a personal one tends to reduce stigma and improve outcomes.

    Can a CEO take time off for mental health without it affecting investor confidence?

    This depends heavily on how the situation is communicated and managed. Increasingly, transparent, well-managed disclosures of planned health-related absences are received better by institutional investors than unexpected departures or erratic performance. The precedent set by figures like Antonio Horta-Osório has shifted the landscape, though significant stigma remains in certain sectors.

    What UK organisations offer support specifically for senior leader mental health?

    Business in the Community runs programmes specifically targeting executive wellbeing, and the Institute of Directors provides peer support networks for senior leaders. The charity Mental Health UK also offers resources relevant to workplace leadership. Many larger UK employers additionally retain occupational psychiatrists or executive coaching professionals with clinical training as part of their senior leadership support infrastructure.

  • The Tokenisation of Everything: How Blockchain Is Quietly Revolutionising Asset Ownership in 2026

    The Tokenisation of Everything: How Blockchain Is Quietly Revolutionising Asset Ownership in 2026

    There is a moment in financial history when the infrastructure shifts so fundamentally that the old gatekeepers simply become irrelevant. The invention of the joint-stock company did it in the seventeenth century. The London Stock Exchange did it in 1801. And now, quietly but with considerable force, real world asset tokenisation in 2026 is doing it again — dissolving the walls between institutional capital and everyone else, one digital token at a time.

    This is not a story about cryptocurrency speculation or NFT fever. Those episodes, colourful as they were, were largely rehearsals. What is happening now is structurally different: established asset classes — prime property in Edinburgh’s New Town, a Damien Hirst sculpture, a stake in a mid-market private equity fund — are being converted into digital tokens on regulated blockchains, traded with legal clarity, and made accessible to investors who would previously have been turned away at the door.

    Financial professionals discussing real world asset tokenisation 2026 in a London office with digital displays
    Financial professionals discussing real world asset tokenisation 2026 in a London office with digital displays

    What Real World Asset Tokenisation Actually Means

    Strip away the technical language and the concept is straightforward. A real world asset — something with tangible value that exists off a blockchain — is represented as a digital token. Ownership of that token confers a legally enforceable claim on the underlying asset, or a proportional share of its income and appreciation. The blockchain provides the ledger: immutable, transparent, and accessible without a clearing house or a custody bank extracting fees at every juncture.

    The tokenisation can be fractional. A Georgian townhouse in Bath worth £2.4 million might be divided into 24,000 tokens at £100 each. A pension-age investor in Dundee who cannot commit £500,000 to a property fund minimum can now hold a meaningful, liquid position in prime residential real estate. A collector who loves Basquiat but cannot afford the whole canvas can own a verified fraction of it. These are not hypotheticals. Platforms are executing these structures today, increasingly under the scrutiny — and, critically, the regulatory frameworks — of the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Why 2026 Is the Inflection Point

    The FCA’s sandbox approach to tokenised securities, combined with the UK Government’s stated ambition to position Britain as a global hub for digital assets, has created genuine institutional momentum. HM Treasury published its digital assets regulatory framework to considerable attention, and whilst implementation has been incremental, it has sent the signal that matters most to institutional capital: this is legal, this is supervised, and this is here to stay.

    Globally, research from the Boston Consulting Group estimated that tokenised assets could represent $16 trillion in value by 2030. Within the UK, real world asset tokenisation in 2026 is attracting serious attention from pension funds, family offices, and wealth managers who previously dismissed blockchain as a retail curiosity. The difference now is settlement speed, regulatory clarity, and the emergence of institutional-grade custody solutions.

    The Asset Classes Being Transformed

    Property

    UK residential and commercial property has long been the most coveted asset class and the most inaccessible. Tokenisation is chipping at both problems simultaneously. Fractional ownership structures are allowing retail investors entry at four-figure sums whilst providing developers with an alternative fundraising channel that bypasses traditional bank lending. The secondary market liquidity — being able to sell your token position without waiting for an entire property transaction to complete — is arguably the single most transformative feature. Anyone who has sold a house in England will appreciate precisely why that matters.

    Fine Art and Collectibles

    The art market has historically rewarded the well-connected above all else. Auction houses set the terms, private dealers hold the relationships, and provenance disputes have derailed many an acquisition. Tokenised art, recorded on an immutable ledger, addresses the provenance question with unusual elegance. Several platforms are now working directly with London galleries and estate representatives to tokenise works, with the blockchain record serving as both ownership certificate and exhibition history.

    Tablet showing tokenised property investment platform, illustrating real world asset tokenisation 2026
    Tablet showing tokenised property investment platform, illustrating real world asset tokenisation 2026

    Private Equity and Credit

    This is perhaps where the disruption cuts deepest. Private equity funds have traditionally required minimum commitments of £250,000 or more, locking investors in for seven to ten years with minimal liquidity. Tokenised private equity structures are beginning to offer quarterly liquidity windows, lower entry thresholds, and automated distribution of carried interest through smart contracts. The fund administrator, the transfer agent, the custodian: each one sees their margin threatened. The institutional reaction has been predictable — several have moved to acquire tokenisation platforms rather than resist them.

    Infrastructure and Commodities

    Renewable energy projects, port infrastructure, and even agricultural land are entering tokenisation pipelines. A solar farm in Lincolnshire raising expansion capital via tokenised revenue-sharing agreements is a genuinely novel structure that offers retail investors inflation-linked returns tied to actual kilowatt-hour output. It is complex, it requires careful legal architecture, and it is happening.

    The Risks That Sophisticated Investors Must Understand

    A genuinely clear-eyed assessment cannot ignore the considerable risks. Liquidity is promised but not guaranteed; secondary markets for tokenised assets remain thin outside the largest platforms, and a token is only as liquid as the buyers willing to purchase it. Smart contract vulnerabilities have cost investors hundreds of millions globally. Jurisdictional ambiguity persists: a token representing a Scottish property, held on a Swiss blockchain, traded by an investor in Singapore, raises questions that no single regulator has yet definitively answered.

    Valuation remains deeply imperfect. The underlying asset — whether a Mayfair flat or a Warhol print — requires independent appraisal, and those appraisals carry the same subjectivity they always have. Tokenisation does not transform a poorly valued asset into a well-valued one; it merely distributes that valuation risk more broadly.

    The FCA has been explicit that tokenised securities which meet the definition of regulated investments fall under existing financial promotion rules. Any platform that sidesteps this by claiming their tokens are something other than securities warrants substantial scepticism.

    What This Means for Traditional Financial Intermediaries

    The longer-term consequence for wealth managers, private banks, and fund administrators is significant but not immediately catastrophic. The most astute incumbents are incorporating tokenisation into their own offerings. Several UK wealth management firms have begun offering tokenised exposure to alternative assets as a complement to conventional portfolios, recognising that the client demand is real and that resistance is commercially self-defeating.

    The intermediaries most at risk are those whose value proposition rests entirely on exclusive access rather than genuine expertise. If a family office’s primary function is providing entry to a fund that is now tokenised and broadly accessible, the justification for its fee structure becomes rather thin. Expertise, judgement, and personalised counsel retain their value. Administrative gatekeeping, considerably less so.

    How to Approach This as an Investor in 2026

    The appropriate posture is one of engaged curiosity rather than wholesale commitment. Real world asset tokenisation in 2026 is a maturing market, not a mature one. Due diligence must cover the legal wrapper, the regulatory status of the platform, the quality of the underlying asset, the custody arrangement for the tokens, and the realistic liquidity conditions. These are not easy questions, and any platform that makes them sound easy deserves additional scrutiny.

    For those prepared to do that work, the opportunity is genuine. Access to assets that were structurally closed to all but the wealthiest institutions is not a trivial development. It is, potentially, one of the more consequential shifts in the architecture of private wealth this generation will witness.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is real world asset tokenisation and how does it work?

    Real world asset tokenisation converts ownership rights in tangible assets — property, art, private equity — into digital tokens on a blockchain. Each token represents a legally enforceable fractional claim on the underlying asset, enabling purchase, sale, and transfer without traditional intermediaries like custodian banks or clearing houses.

    Is real world asset tokenisation legal in the UK?

    Yes, provided the structure complies with FCA regulations. Tokenised securities that meet the definition of regulated investments fall under existing UK financial services law, including financial promotion rules. HM Treasury has published a digital assets regulatory framework to provide greater clarity, and FCA-regulated platforms must adhere to standard authorisation requirements.

    What is the minimum investment for tokenised assets in the UK?

    Minimum investment thresholds vary by platform and asset class, but fractional tokenisation is specifically designed to lower entry points dramatically. Some property tokenisation platforms accept investments from as little as £100 to £500, compared to the £250,000-plus minimums typical of institutional private equity funds.

    How liquid are tokenised assets compared to traditional investments?

    Liquidity is one of tokenisation’s key promises but also one of its current limitations. Secondary markets exist but remain relatively thin for most tokenised assets outside the largest platforms. Investors should treat liquidity as a potential rather than a guarantee, and examine platform-specific secondary market conditions carefully before committing capital.

    What are the main risks of investing in tokenised real world assets?

    Key risks include smart contract vulnerabilities, thin secondary market liquidity, valuation uncertainty in the underlying asset, jurisdictional regulatory ambiguity, and platform counterparty risk. The FCA does not guarantee the performance of any tokenised investment, and investors should conduct thorough due diligence on both the platform’s regulatory status and the quality of the underlying asset.

The Latest